Brute Reason

A collection of thoughts about psychology, social justice, and anything else I give a shit about. freethoughtblogs.com/brutereason

Topics: feminism / psychology / lgbtq / sex / politics / abortion / health / mental illness / language / depression / sexism / sexual assault / fashion / racism / education / social justice

my actual writing, if you're curious

Nobody is saying that Lena Dunham doesn’t deserve critique. Debate and discussion is part of the life of a piece of art, particularly when it comes to episodic television, which has replaced film as the dominant medium of collective storytelling. What is curious is that no male showrunner has ever been subject to quite this sort of intense personal scrutiny, this who-are-you-and-how-dare-you. No male showrunner has ever been asked to speak to a universal male experience in the same way, because “man” is still a synonym for “human being” in a way that “woman” is not.

Men do not experience the personal being made universal. When men direct honest, funny television shows about young men living their lives, it’s not “television that defines the young male experience”, it’s just television. When men write “confessional literature”, it’s just called “literature”. Male artists and writers produce deeply personal content all the time, but as Sarah Menkedick once wrote at Velamag, for them “it’s called ‘criticism’ or ‘putting yourself in the story’ or ‘voice-driven’ or ‘narrative’ or ‘travelogue’ or ‘history’ or ‘new journalism’ or simply a ‘literary journey’”.

Forbidding any woman simply to be an artist, forbidding us from speaking about our experience without having it universalised and trivialised, is the sort of broad-brush benevolent sexism that undermines the real threat that a multitude of female voices might otherwise pose. It comes from a culture that puts up endless barriers to prevent women and girls expressing ourselves honestly in public and then treats us like fascinating freaks when we do. Is still so rare, so unbelievably, fist-clenchingly rare, to see young women depicted in the mainstream media with anything like accuracy, as human beings rather than pretty punctuations in somebody else’s story, that as soon as it happens we want it to be more than it is. So Girls is asked to speak for every young woman everywhere, and then torn apart when it inevitably fails to do so, because nobody can, because nobody ever could. And that’s the problem.

  1. nothinglessthaninfinite reblogged this from winuwo
  2. hey-koolthing reblogged this from brutereason
  3. evrl-y reblogged this from wakeupandlookwithin
  4. wakeupandlookwithin reblogged this from brutereason
  5. occasionalshenanigans reblogged this from brutereason
  6. standingonthecastironshore reblogged this from girlsfanshbo
  7. good-morning-captain-crunch reblogged this from sweetbabyguap
  8. valdara reblogged this from brutereason
  9. olivepip reblogged this from girlsfanshbo
  10. itsnotabigdeal reblogged this from girlsfanshbo
  11. girlsfanshbo reblogged this from hkuuu
  12. never-take-it-seriously reblogged this from brutereason
  13. goldipants reblogged this from rbateson
  14. illegalaustralien reblogged this from lordtrash
  15. lordtrash reblogged this from brutereason
  16. poisoningpigeonsinthepark reblogged this from lizziegoneastray
  17. excessallareas reblogged this from brutereason
  18. oldgreyhamster reblogged this from brutereason
  19. onbeauty-andbeingjust reblogged this from wiltedbones
  20. pearlsandink reblogged this from theheadandthisheart
  21. theheadandthisheart reblogged this from pearlsandink
  22. maryleong reblogged this from pearlsandink
  23. toomanykitties reblogged this from brutereason
  24. white-cis-male reblogged this from brutereason
  25. waveschocolatenetflix reblogged this from rbateson

blog comments powered by Disqus
Ultralite Powered by Tumblr | Designed by:Doinwork