Brute Reason

A collection of thoughts about psychology, social justice, and anything else I give a shit about. freethoughtblogs.com/brutereason

Topics: feminism / psychology / lgbtq / sex / politics / abortion / health / mental illness / language / depression / sexism / sexual assault / fashion / racism / education / social justice

my actual writing, if you're curious

What is the burden of proof for assuming that a person is lying? If you are a famous film director, it turns out to be quite high. You don’t have to say a word in your defense, in fact, and people who have directed documentaries about you will write lengthy essays in the Daily Beast tearing down the testimony of your accusers. You can just go about your life making movie after movie, and it’s fine. But if you are a woman who has accused a great film director of molesting you when you were seven, the starting point is the presumption that, without real evidence, you are not telling the truth. In the court of public opinion, a woman accusing a great film director of raping her has no credibility which his fans are bound to respect. He has something to lose, his good name. She does not, because she does not have a good name. She is living in hiding, under an assumed name. And when she is silent, the Daily Beast does not rise to her defense.

In a rape culture, there is no burden on us to presume that she is not a liar, no necessary imperative to treat her like a person whose account of herself can be taken seriously. It is important that we presume he is innocent. It is not important that we presume she is not making it all up out of female malice. In a rape culture, you can say things like “We can’t really know what really happened, so let’s all act as if Woody Allen is innocent (and she is lying).” In a rape culture, you can use your ignorance to cast doubt on her knowledge; you can admit that you have no basis for casting doubt on Dylan’s statement, and then you can ignore her account of herself. A famous man is not speaking, so her testimony is not admissible evidence. His name is Woody Allen, and in a rape culture, that good name must be shielded and protected. What is her name?

  1. xkiharux reblogged this from bona-fide-realist
  2. karl-marx-montclaire reblogged this from oneextrahourintheballpit
  3. letsmakethefirefliesdance reblogged this from brieberryy
  4. stonec-old reblogged this from brieberryy
  5. brieberryy reblogged this from supreme-shieldmaiden
  6. supreme-shieldmaiden reblogged this from yoursocialconstructsareshowing
  7. charredbaby reblogged this from yoursocialconstructsareshowing
  8. yoursocialconstructsareshowing reblogged this from brutereason
  9. foolishvirgins reblogged this from brutereason
  10. directcitation reblogged this from albabutter
  11. thestrengthofmylife reblogged this from semijunior
  12. helenhooverboyle reblogged this from oneextrahourintheballpit
  13. witabif reblogged this from albabutter
  14. albabutter reblogged this from sleeptightgrimrite
  15. thecoinedexpression reblogged this from adrowningwoman
  16. playfulmist reblogged this from brutereason
  17. adelinearden reblogged this from miss-bulbasaur
  18. psychadelicyarncastle reblogged this from sleeptightgrimrite
  19. sleeptightgrimrite reblogged this from adrowningwoman
  20. smallswingshoes reblogged this from brutereason
  21. caramelizedopinion reblogged this from brutereason
  22. adrowningwoman reblogged this from imathers
  23. obscuranna reblogged this from bongham
  24. miss-bulbasaur reblogged this from iknowyouwillbehappyhere
  25. lioneltwain reblogged this from iknowyouwillbehappyhere

blog comments powered by Disqus
Ultralite Powered by Tumblr | Designed by:Doinwork