Brute Reason

A collection of thoughts about psychology, social justice, and anything else I give a shit about. freethoughtblogs.com/brutereason

Topics: feminism / psychology / lgbtq / sex / politics / abortion / health / mental illness / language / depression / sexism / sexual assault / fashion / racism / education / social justice

my actual writing, if you're curious

wechoosewhatweloosefor:

brutereason:

wechoosewhatweloosefor:

brutereason:

This seems like a good time to mention that, when a friend says that they’ve made progress on a mental health issue, it is generally inappropriate to criticize their progress as Insufficiently Rational/Skeptical.

Yes, there are caveats. Yes, sometimes people do dangerous things trying to get better. Yes, sometimes people do quack treatments that don’t work. Yes, yes, yes.

But if someone says, “Hey guys, I’m feeling better!” and whatever you say is less along the lines of “That’s awesome, good for you!” and more along the lines of “UR DOIN IT RONG,” then you’re doing more harm than good.

And from one skeptic/atheist to another, at that point, you can shove your skepticism/atheism you-know-where.

I don’t understand what you are saying here exactly, how could a response to mental illness be insufficiently skeptical? Are you trying to refer to homeopathic “drugs”?

I agree with you, people should be happy when others make progress in that sphere, but how can a treatment be irrational?

I, as a skeptic, am just wondering because it doesn’t sound like a fair use of those two words. 

For instance, if someone finds religious observance helpful, or if pseudo-spiritual concepts like having a soul or having a deeper purpose in life have been helpful to them.

Do people really have souls? Is there really a god? Does life really have any intrinsic purpose? I don’t believe so, no. But if believing so helps someone else, I’d rather see them mentally healthy than mentally ill.

Ok, but if that person wishes to say that this idea is true, then I feel I have a obligation to debate them on it. If they keep it to themselves then I don’t care, but otherwise you have to treat them as a thinking person. 

I have heard an example from Dawkins, of a nonbeliever still praying because it helps him think. I have take no issue with that, but if they take the religious route and say they are actually talking to a supernatural being, then I feel you have to argue. 

No, you do not have an “obligation to debate” anyone. Especially not when they’re posting publicly about something personal and painful like mental illness (and recovery thereof).

If someone posts a status that just says, “I believe we have souls,” then the protocols are quite different and respectful debate is appropriate. But I’m not talking about those situations. I’m talking about when someone has taken the immensely brave step of openly discussing their mental health problems, and when they’re accomplished the extremely difficult step of progressing towards recovery. That is not an appropriate time to debate. 

Yes, treating people as thinking people is important. It’s equally if not more important to treat them as feeling people. Do not undermine someone’s recovery from mental illness by questioning it, insulting it, and/or treating it as illegitimate or as a subject for debate. I can’t say this strongly enough.

  1. yoursocialconstructsareshowing reblogged this from brutereason and added:
    this is so spot-on. it happened to me in this way: i got some self-help books and decided i was ready to move on to a...
  2. nightshadequeen reblogged this from brutereason
  3. m0nst3rj3n reblogged this from brutereason
  4. biblename reblogged this from brutereason
  5. lilwitch reblogged this from brutereason
  6. antinahottub reblogged this from brutereason and added:
    Reblogged for the main line of commentary. I think it definitely has to do with timing and tact. You can disprove...
  7. steinpratt reblogged this from brutereason
  8. slightlyabandoned reblogged this from brutereason
  9. darkladynyara reblogged this from brutereason
  10. mangasockattack reblogged this from brutereason
  11. wetmattos reblogged this from brutereason
  12. fotp-friendofthepeople reblogged this from brutereason
  13. muslimfeminist reblogged this from brutereason
  14. quinn-the-human reblogged this from brutereason
  15. h0lyshitshesmellslikeheaven reblogged this from brutereason
  16. brutereason reblogged this from electro-creep and added:
    Welp, there it is.
  17. gruntledandhinged reblogged this from feministbatwoman
  18. ame-kage reblogged this from feministbatwoman
  19. westoppedreaming reblogged this from margotkim
  20. o0hyperion0o reblogged this from 0thefemalecapacity0
  21. thestevildeadii-deadbydawn reblogged this from brutereason and added:
    Thanks for the response! I’ll keep that in mind for the future.
  22. aesoi reblogged this from 0thefemalecapacity0
  23. margotkim reblogged this from electro-creep
  24. electro-creep reblogged this from feministbatwoman and added:
    I want people to understand how deep this manifesto of “My Sense of Smug Superiority Matters More to Me Than the...

blog comments powered by Disqus
Ultralite Powered by Tumblr | Designed by:Doinwork